Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2014 October 16

src: upload.wikimedia.org

16 Oktober

Video Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2014 October 16

Meminta pada 06:35:56, 16 Oktober 2014 untuk bantuan pengajuan AfC oleh Evacsato

• Evacsato (talk  · contribs)
  • Pengguna: Evacsato (edit | bicara | riwayat | tautan | tonton | log)

Contributions to Lars Johanson have been rejected twice. I want to get help with improving references. Lars Johanson is professor emeritus at Mainz University in Germany and author of many books, articles in journals, Encyclopaedia Britannica, other international handbooks. I do not understand how I can argue better for the notation in my contribution. Please help me. Best regards, Eva

Evacsato (talk) 06:35, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

The draft is the Draft: Lars Johanson. User: DGG may be able to provide some feedback on this. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 06:44, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

I've provided the right advice. DGG (talk) 02:34, October 17, 2014 (UTC)

Maps Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2014 October 16

08:58:24, October 16, 2014 review submission by Nimantharaj

• NimantharajÃ, (talkÃ, Ã, Â · contribs)
  • Draft: Chandima Gomes, Master of Lightning Protection in Asia (edit | talk | history | link | panta | log)

Nimantharaj (bicara) 08:58, 16 Oktober 2014 (UTC)

I changed the words because I thought OK. Being my teacher and mentor, I may have written Prof.'s description. Gomes with praised tones. May I know if I need to change further. I have seen many articles on Wikipedia in the same way. thank you

src: upload.wikimedia.org

Move content box

Dear Sir/Madam

Can you please tell me how to move content box under the title of my article in Walsall Central Library. I have searched everywhere and felt a bit confusing! Many thanks, Helena - Ã, unmarked comments previously added by Lovewalsalllibraries (talk o contribs) 09:37, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Articles have titles already under their name. Your additional headline is useless, and I've deleted it. TOC has now been in the right place, whereas before, above your faux title. I have left comments on your draft about the obvious piece of work required, but I have not given it a detailed review. The main part you need to create should not have a title, or you'll re-create the issues I've solved for you. Fiddle Faddle 09:44, October 16, 2014 (UTC)

src: bmjopen.bmj.com

11:17:46, October 16, 2014 review submission by Joeeddy8

• Joeeddy8Ã, (talkÃ, Ã, Â · contribs)
  • Draft: Leah TottonÃ, (edit | talk | history | watch | watchlist)

I do not understand why the notation for the subject is not worth wikipedia - I have 21 references for a rather short article which are all from a solid source.

And the quote has been fixed correctly unless I misunderstand it, it has also been waiting for review for more than two weeks and Leah Totton wants this live ASAP

Thank you for your time.

Joeeddy8 (talk) 11:17, October 16, 2014 (UTC)

No one cares what Leah Totton wants. I imagine you are his homework agent? We prohibit WP: COI and paid editors. This is WIkipedia. Get a website if the one you want is PR.

In the meantime I have left a comment on your draft which shows why I would not accept it if I reviewed it today. You have work to do. Fiddle Faddle 12:03, October 16, 2014 (UTC)

You may prefer reference 9 [1] but I do not think the author is. PrimeHunter (talk) 13:04, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Well, that is even submitted. Not bad for tabloid paper that is not known as WP: RS!. However, since Leah Totton wants a quick decision, I have seen it aloud and been rejected because it is not incorrectly sourced. I have based it on the comments I left on it. Fiddle Faddle 21:25, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

src: upload.wikimedia.org

13:57:10, 16 October 2014 review submission by Dominicono

• DominiconoÃ, (talkÃ, Ã, Â · contribs)
  • Draft: Bear's Den (band) Ã, (edit | talk | history | links | watch | log)

I have submitted a new page for a band. The submission was made a few weeks ago but the process did not seem to move forward. there are tips. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Bear's_Den_(band)

Dominicono (talk) 13:57, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Sometimes it's like waiting for a bus. Wait and wait then a number of reviewers come at once. We review volunteers and we only review drafts that we think are worth reviewing. Fiddle Faddle 21:28, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

src: digitalnewsroom.org

21:12: 42, 16 October 2014 review submission by 50.141.183.90

• 50.141.183.90Ã, (talk Ã, Â · contribs)

50.141.183.90 (talk) 21:12, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Halo,

The article for Lightswitch has been rejected three times. Every time I make an edit to reflect the reviewers comments. Can you help me determine what I should do to get the article published?

Thank you,

Liz

One of the best ways is to talk to the reviewer who rejected it last. Our role as reviewers is to ensure that an article will not be directly subject to one of our removal processes when received. That's why we pushed him back to the author. We want to receive articles. Fiddle Faddle 21:20, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

src: upload.wikimedia.org

21:24:08, 16 October 2014 draft review by ApensarApp

• ApensarAppÃ, (talkÃ, Ã, Â · contribs)
  • Draft: Appensa AppÃ, (edit | talk | history | links | watch | log)

We need help with quotation information, the info in our article comes directly from the company. What reference should we use?

ApensarApp (talk) 21:24, October 16, 2014 (UTC)

We need references from significant coverage of article topics, and standalone , and in WP: RS . View WP: 42. Your username does not match, nor is your usage of first person plural. One account/one editor, and no company name. Fiddle Faddle 21:36, October 16, 2014 (UTC)

src: www.bmj.com

21:36:31, 16 October 2014 review submission by Roland Werner

• RolandÃ, WernerÃ, (talkÃ, Ã, Â · contribs)

My article celebrating my brother's life was rejected. I can understand what it is. I do not know of any of your instructions that the article should be written in HTML. Your system completely changes it from Microsoft's x.DOS article. I am fully aware that I have to edit it on a large scale before you can read it comfortably. It will take some time, if OK, I have not done HTML for 15 years. Do fit the correct submission when actually edited. Notice with this kind of editing, I will get 10 edits in an instant. I modeled after Einstein Biography. "Please read the first two pages with intro by Prof. Pinxten This is the only material referenced at the end of the article The rest is my total creations New topics :: How do you add photos to text in the box? See Einstein.Please this met with your approval And please let me know! Friendly, Roland Roland Werner (talk) 21:36, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

No, it should not be written in HTML. All you need to do is skip the simple text. It's really easy. I do not know what yoiu used to make it in the first place, but the process does not require any HTML at all. Indeed, please do not use it. You may find one useful online chat link for help? Fiddle Faddle 21:41, October 16, 2014 (UTC)

Most html actually works, but I regard wikicode as a simplified part. Knowledge of html makes learning a certain simplification very easy. DGG (talk) 03:14, October 17, 2014 (UTC)

src: i.imgur.com

22:20:12, 16 October 2014 draft review by Efrain Ib

• EfrainÃ, IbÃ, iÃ, (talkÃ, Ã, Â · contribs)
  • Draft: South County EDCÃ, (edit | talk | history | links | watch | log)

Efrain Ib (talk) 22:20, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your previous guidance.

Question; I am writing an article about SCEDC, South County Economic Development Counsel. I work for SCEDC.

The error message says: The main contributors to the article seem to have a close relationship with the subject. Also, "Notability Guidelines" say: "Do not make a page about yourself, your company.....

Is this article unacceptable by Wikipedia, if completed, because the author is working for SCEDCÃ, ??? Please advise. Thank you very much.

If you're patient with drafts & gt; send & gt; reviews & gt; edit & gt; resend (etc) the process, then everything will be fine, provided you listen and apply the suggestions well and are able to write neutrally about your company. It is useful to explicitly state your status on the talk page of the draft itself, even though you do not have to state your real name (assuming you are not using it). Deploying {{Connected contributor}} on the talk page is also considered appropriate. Fiddle Faddle 22:36, October 16, 2014 (UTC)

src: osconjunctionnet.files.wordpress.com

23:11:12, October 16 2014 review by Hamik.m

• Hamik.mÃ, (talk Ã, Â · contribs)
  • Draft: Tigran TsitoghdzyanÃ, (edit | talk | history | links | watch | log)

For the lord

I waited for my first article review for more than 6 weeks. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Tigran_Tsitoghdzyan Please help me to promote it. It's just a brief bio from a painter...

Greetings

Hamik.m (talk) 23:11, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

I have received this draft and it is now in Tigran Tsitoghdzyan. There are still many problems with it, but this can be solved in the main article space. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 07:02, October 17, 2014 (UTC)

Source of the article : Wikipedia