Video Talk:Data ownership
Peer - Karin
Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there a distraction? All of your information seems very relevant to the topic you're dealing with. There are some spelling and grammatical suggestions I have for you. I have it in the word document I will get for you. The first two parts seem to contain similar information. It may be more obvious if you can put the information in the two parts together in one section of the prospect. You may also want to introduce the following sections at the beginning, so readers know what you've included.
Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that seem very biased towards a certain position? There does not seem to be any bias or frames in your information.
Check the quote. Does the link work? Does the source support the claim in the article? All relevant and recent quotes. All links work.
Are facts backed by proper and reliable references? I would say that this is where your articles can use a little more work. Find the source for the information you serve in your first two parts to back up. Even ideas that seem like general knowledge can be cited, just to be sure.
Is there information out of date? Not at all.
Concluding Thoughts? You have a good start for your Warner article! Including a few more quotes will increase the overall strength of your article. You may also want to consider including a little more information about Open Data Ownership and Medical Data Ownership. Maybe you can find statements from organizations or companies that fall into that category, or examples of legal processes that will fall under those titles. Examples may help strengthen your article, and to help clarify what can be a confusing topic. I really feel that you have done some good work in clarifying! I look forward to seeing the next draft! - Ã, unmarked comments previously added by Undergradmom76 (talk o contribs) 00:54, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Maps Talk:Data ownership
Review Peer Maddie
Hai!
So, some comments on your draft (hopefully doing this right).
It may be good to define ownership in legal terms, and then explain how both remain the same or modified when applicable to the data. It might also be a good idea to distinguish between data types (Primary, Big Data, Disposal Data, that sort of thing) because depending on what kind of data is collected, I would assume that ownership issues may vary and if so, it would be good to see that.
Also, it would be interesting to use some legal case instances where ownership of data is contested, and what results are different. Setting precedents and things like that, as well as seeing the arguments that each party brought to the table to justify their position.
For the ownership of separate data from medical data, Facebook, Google, and many other social media platforms would be a great thing to see in terms of what it collects and who owns it. Especially since there is clear data collected, like likes and shares (in the case of Facebook), but what other data might be more likely to have ownership in question?
I also recommend that you include a historical section to discuss changes in data collection that have taken place with the rapid digitization and enhancement of online life (from chatting with people, banking and shopping, to apps that track every and every aspect of your life). The idea of ​​ownership of data about self has quickly evolved with this shift, and doing comparison and contrast will provide better insight into how data has changed the ways in which ownership is thought out, and illustrates some issues with ownership in a data rich world.
Hope it helps!
Maddie MaddieLeJeune (bicara) 18:29, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Source of the article : Wikipedia
0 Comments