Hello and welcome! Feel free to leave a comment, or if you have a question about paintball, leave the question in the appropriate section below and you will usually get an answer in about a day.
7eieiieei2137 {| style = "border: 1px solid #aaa; padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 1em" width = "100%"! style = "Background: gainsboro; text-align: center; border-top: 1px solid black;" | WikiProject Paintball News edit | - | style = "Align: Middle" |
- The term "paintball gun" is no longer used in any article: please change this wherever you see it! We should use the term paintball marker at any time from now on. Keep up the good work. RavenStorm, Main Coordinator
- Highly recommended by fellow members Three ways round that we add references and resources to our articles and make this our priority for now, due to the recent slowly growing and adding articles. Find articles that do not have the resources and get good referrals! Together we can make WikiProject Paintball more authentic and encyclopedic. RavenStorm, Main Coordinator
| - |}
Video Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Paintball
Peer Review
If we push towards the FA status for Paintball and Woodsball, Maybe we should start asking for peer review. I actually posted one on the woodsball talk page, but I deleted it because I was supposed to get approval from the community. Community, please your response. <-> booth Talk 02:20, July 10, 2007 (UTC)
Maps Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Paintball
Request Info - Marker Specific Barrel Bore Info
I have edited the Paintball-gun infobox template and added the "Bore" section. From now on any article that uses infobox but fails to determine bore information will simply read " Uncertain " in the "Bore" section. If you know the bore information about the marker, please specify in the infobox article to reflect the standard bore size/stock. Also, many article paintball markers are missing this infobox please help standardize this article by adding it. Pmicka 19:57, June 11, 2007 (UTC)
Paintball stub project
Hi, friends. I think it's time we got setup stub template for paintball related stubs. Since there are no stubs yet, the first step is to collect as many articles as possible within the qualified paintball sphere as a stub.
WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposal
Any suggestions? --Pmicka 04:27, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Here is a simple stub that I just created that we can use for templates.
It's a good idea, but is not that somewhat within the scope of the assessment committee mentioned below?!? The rating committee should be followed up immediately. I thought?!?. maybe we should talk about it over there. - Three how to round 01:33, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
ps. if you are interested in joining a rating committee, just say in the section
It is within the grasp of anyone who has the time to help compile a list of short paintball related articles that can be classified as a Stub, regardless of article quality. This will make it easier to keep track of the articles that need to be done and will make it a little less spread. Pmicka 00:45, April 5, 2007 (UTC)
Paintball as an FA article
Hello all! Please note that the last item on the To-Do FA list for the Paintball article has been completed today. This article is pretty much an article to show, so I say it should be nominated. Mind? Suggestion? ~ Ma x I m illi , 23:56, November 13, 2006 (UTC)
- Anyway, all of it, I think it's going to have to undergo the old reviews. Forgot to mention it last night. Again, any comments before we do something? ~ Ma x I m illi , 20:09, November 14, 2006 (UTC)
- Hey, just wondering: After an article is nominated, can it never be re-nominated? (if failed to make) Editor 2 23:41, November 14, 2006 (UTC)
- No, it can be nominated again, which is a good thing, because I can still find one big mistake with it (the graphics are terrible). However, it can be undesirable for an article to be nominated, but fails to nominate. The nomination failure is recorded, you see. For some editors, it is a black mark against the article. But the good thing is that after a failed nomination article, it can be completely changed by article proponents and renominated. ~ Ma x I m illi , 06:24, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Hey, just wondering: After an article is nominated, can it never be re-nominated? (if failed to make) Editor 2 23:41, November 14, 2006 (UTC)
The article was very short on references, like many paintball articles. Many parts without wikilinks or reference references altogether, like the entire "Playback location" section, which reads like someone's opinion. The assertion of specific facts can actually use it. The equipment section requires a brief summary and an overview of the tools, not just links to other articles. The price of paintball is really not important enough to be at the forefront, and like many other pieces of information sounds like original research/opinion, it is not a sourced conclusion. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 12:11, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your thoughts. One repetitive problem we have is finding references. Paintball is not a sport where every body has a lot of authority, unfortunately. Magazines are hard to find good information on, and there are some books that are modern and have something that is really significant to say other than novice nonsense. Nothing wrong with newbies.Ã,;)
- Anyway, people are complaining about the lack of resources, but nothing we can really do. Sometimes we are lucky. Someone worked hard with Paintball articles to find sources for it, and I'm afraid one day we may have to use SpecOPS for reference woodball and scenarios. But hey, if that happens, we can go to About.com. Most of their paintball articles are deprived of our work. D: If anyone has an idea, do not share it. They will be greatly welcomed. ~ Ma x I m illi , 17:49, December 22, 2006 (UTC)
this really does not help much about paintball articles but for some paintball markers and other tools, we can site the company that create the equpment page. Moreover I am fresh from the idea, sorry. I will keep my eyes open for anything we can use.
Three ways round 23 December 19:39 (UTC)
- It's a good idea. I will remember it; hopefully everyone will. x me m illi , 23:55, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi, it brings my attention to the paintball talk page that has not been much discussed about paintball being nominated back for the FA position, so maybe we should at least start talking about it, and encourage it to get better. I think it would be a good time to concentrate on that, especially with the article rating system that will start, it would be nice if we could have an FA article in our category. I thought I would start concentrating on this page a bit more (I previously focused on the Tippmann page), just make it smoother, and see if I could somehow find some refrences. anyway let me know what you think
peace- Three ways round 01:42, 1 Februari 2007 (UTC)
Strategi Woodsball sebagai artikel unggulan berikutnya; peringkat kualitas artikel
Hello all! An important member of this project recently suggested to me that we must have a Woodsball strategy to be labeled Flagship articles from the project. It reminds me of the whole issue of quality rankings in articles, long after a good article and the FA. WikiProject Military History has a quality scoring scale that we can model afterwards, albeit modified for our much smaller subject. My first thought was, we created a sub-page of the project where we can discuss each article, maybe in alphabetical order, and provide quality ratings, maybe from a scale like this....
1. Featured articles. (Best project work - our FA version.) Example: Paintball, Woodsball 2. Good article. (Nice page, but not comprehensive enough or professional like Flagships.) Example: Speedball, Paintball Scenario 3. Working Articles. (Pages that require great work.) Example: Paintball Strategy, Paintball Tank 4. Stub. (Pages that are not comprehensive at all, or just getting started.) Example: Oliver Lang, Woodsball looter
Keep in mind, this is a very basic idea. There are many wrinkles to smooth, especially the methods we use to determine the quality of the articles. My thinking is, we discussed it on the sub-pages mentioned above, and when we have a general consensus for one rank or another, that's what we value as. Idea idea? Mind? Comment ~ Ma x my m , 06:33, January 7, 2007 (UTC)
Cool, thanks for the feedback. No one else from the Project seems to be very active right now, except I think I saw Robogymnast doing something the other day. Oh, and VegitaU viewed from time to time returning vandalism to the Paintball article. But overall, I started to fear that unless you and I, we are the only ones still working for the Project. Oh well! Ã,: D I think we just have to carry out this idea and the others we have, and if others come and dislike it, they can say it.
When I have time, I will create a sub-page of the project so that we can begin assessing the article. Any volunteers for the "rating committee"? x me m illi , 05:29, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- i volenteer, and yes we are the only two active people today, but that also means that we can get things without waiting for many people to agree, it just speeds a bit. but yes.... I just forgot to forget what I'm going to say so I'll just go
- peace-Three ways round 21:54, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- I'll see if I can set up some templates for them... it might take a few days if I make it fancy. RavenStorm 16:28, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Okay, cool. I think it's official, then - Three ways round and I am now an official article quality rating committee, which we can shorten to become the AQR Committee. Bring champagne! I will start working on the project page, and I will put a link on the main project page so everyone can see what's happening.
Thanks for the template idea, RavenStorm; maybe you can modify the WikiProject Paintball template to look like WP: MILHIST's, which you can see here. What is your idea? ~ Ma x I m illi , 00:18, January 18, 2007 (UTC)
-
- Good idea Max, I'll get to work on it... for now... right after I get a snack. RavenStorm 02:21, January 18, 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, I see a million possibilities for this. First, what kind of rating system do you want? A-B-C-D-E or 1-5 stars? Try and market yourself to the Military History project system here. And do you want to categorize paintball articles (markers, strategies, positions, rules, etc...) or should I create my own system? RavenStorm 02:32, January 18, 2007 (UTC)
- Ummm... wow. This is really a tricky thing. You have to give me plenty of time to do this, but I think I'll be able to figure it out eventually. You come with categorization and rating system, I will finish the technological work. RavenStorm 02:44, January 18, 2007 (UTC)
well if we are going to model us after military history, they do the whole system of FA, A, GA, B, Start, and Stub rate. This is a very common calculation system, I do not have some other projects that use it. so I'm not sure what Max has in mind but it seems to work well. comment?
Peace-Three ways round 21:14, 19 Januari 2007 (UTC)
hey i was just thinking about the problem with that system this morning, with that we would not have any way to include the flagship article (i'm pretty sure there's already a template or something for the scoring system), and i'm not sure if we can judge something FA, is the actual FA no matter what we think it should be. let me know if I'm wrong or anything.
Peace-Three ways round 17:22, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
-
- FA ranking will be provided for the actual Featured Article, and I will create my own template and include the Flagship... RavenStorm 19:30, January 20, 2007 (UTC)
Sounds like a plan for me Three ways round 01:30, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
I can also help with rating articles, if you need them. Just tell me what I should do. <-> booth Talk 18:35, July 19, 2007 (UTC)
Priority Task
hey I read the priority task, and about the list of professional teams being cleaned up, it is said that the deadline is December 31st. those things were put into motion before I joined so I did not want to touch it without talking to people about it first. if you want to extend the deadline or remove all unconfirmed ones I do not know, it just looks a bit weird like that.
Peace-Three ways round 21:59, January 14, 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, I'm not too sure about that article. RavenStorm pretty much runs the article; he created it and has been taking care of him ever since. I guess it's his project - maybe you should ask him if he did something with it? ~ Ma x I m illi , 00:18, January 18, 2007 (UTC)
Well, forget it. Many things have happened since I passed the "decision" so I guess there's nothing else to do. * delete * RavenStorm 02:21, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I am new in this group, I will put one page about one or two fields. Let me know what needs to be done.
Jdash here. View the variant page (sync which is the current priority), and it looks like it's done. any thoughts? J-booth 03:35, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Off
Hello members of the Wikipedia Paintball Project!
Some of you may have noted that not much work in the field of large-scale repairs has been done in the last few months. I am busy myself, taking my time for the much more urgent needs and desires of my employer. However, despite my tight schedule, I am still checking my Watch List, like most of you, and making sure our articles stay clean!
So I want to ask you, fellow members, not to be discouraged by so-called inactivity. As long as we continue to guarantee the factual quality and accuracy of every Paintball article here, we do our work! Remember, if you care about paintball on Wikipedia, please continue and add every single paintball article to your watchlist. Not too difficult, just go to the paintball category and add the article there to your watchlist. Do not worry, you will not be inundated with warnings about recent changes! Worst comes to worst, just add an article that seems more important to you. The Paintball article itself should be watched by all our members!
Even so, a lot of good work can be done if members just add a paintball marker image to the Wikipedia server. I will personally see the creation of a paintball marker article.
Keep up the good work and bless God,
Ravenstorm 17:54, 16 Februari 2007 (UTC) Koordinator Utama
GA & amp; Artikel FA
hey i'm pretty sure that we can nominate the article to a good article position. IF that's true (I think) then we have some articles that might get it. That is Woodsball, Paintball, and Woodsball strategies, as well as many others. I think it will help with judging, giving our project a better picture, and I think it will also help us in trying to get the FA in our project. Any thoughts ??
peace- Tiga cara bulat 01:16, 17 Februari 2007 (UTC)
Paintball articles, and Woodsball have both been nominated for good articles. I cuurently wait for the discussion on the Woodsball strategy page, but within about a week will be nominated as well (unless someone comes up with some argument against it). Comments ??
peace- Tiga cara bulat 19:32, 11 Maret 2007 (UTC)
Olahraga Wikiproject
Hey I was wondering if we should be listed as a Decendant of the Wikiproject sport, as we now do not. We are wikiproek related to paintball, and last I checked paintball is a sport. So should not we be there somewhere ???? Any thoughts ????
Three how round > 20:27, March 13, 2007 (UTC)
-
- I have to endure much controversy as to whether paintball is a sport... it stands alone, in the category itself, I believe. So no, do not do that. RavenStorm 16:12, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
ok - Tiga cara bulat 01:11, 15 Maret 2007 (UTC)
sources
ok so the whole nomination of a good article (which all failed for one specific reason to be discussed), I have found one very important, and very significant problem that almost all of our articles face. We do not have sources/refrences. The most resourceful articles, refrences, and inline quotes from all our articles are paintball articles, and even that does not have enough sources. I believe that finding a reliable source should be number one priority (aside from fixing the article in category: paintball but that needless to say). But that's my opinion and since I'm not in an autority position in this project, I will not do anything without anyone saying from the members, and the approval of the RavenStorm ether, Maximilli or both. Anyway that's our situation and I want to here your opinion on that.
> 21:38, March 18, 2007 (UTC)
my man has tried to find the resources, but i have no luck at all. would you believe that my entire school library does not have a book about paintballing. I will try some of the online database my school has, and then I will probably go into the public library if I can.
fight against well, you really Three how to round 21:10, March 20, 2007 (UTC)
Player position
Hey, is everything cool with the changes I made to carpenters and scout pages? I try to take them to the depth of the sniper page. I will focus on those pages for now. Please post a suggestion on the respective talk page. J-booth 16:14, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Ghillie Settings
Hello all! Just joined this group and was wondering if anyone thought there should be an article about sniper sniper ghillies. If so, does this become part of the sniper or just become an independent article. I'm making this article, when something happened and I lost it all. I've made it and propose to join to see who's thinking what, but I'll just ask here. Deflagro 00:51, May 4, 2007 (UTC)
I really do not think that the topic guarantees his own article. Would not it be more effective to expand the woodsball or woodsball marksman article for reference to the use of ghillie suits and links to wiki articles related to that topic: Ghillie suit If the style of play in relation to the woodsball player using it is dramatically unlike other forms of balls wood then the situation will be different. Pmicka 22:59, May 19, 2007 (UTC)
"Marker" or "gun"?
Hi all. After moving the "Electropneumatic paintball gun" to the Electropneumatic paintball marker, it was brought to my attention by other users which might be better for me to open the discussion about the gun - & gt; the marker changes both on Wikipedia: Request a move or on the Talk article page before doing it unilaterally. The argument is that it is not WP policy: PAINTBALL official to refer to "paintball guns" as "markers", I invite editing wars.
So, what does everyone think about making it official policy to call all "paintball guns" a marker? I believe that paintball has and continues to have a bad reputation as a "violent" sport, and that we must do whatever we can to change that image. Given that we aim to be the FA Paintball, I think this is a small policy change that can have a big effect. Is it possible for us to have such a sound? --Donutmonger 06:36, May 15, 2007 (UTC)
- I totally agree with that, and have changed "weapon" to "marker" when I found it. Paintball has enough bad rap from the wrong people thinking that it glorifies violence, and all the big paintball makers I know call their product as a marker. Simply put, weapons are designed to injure or kill, while paintball markers are a tool for sports. Robogymnast 00:29, May 16, 2007 (UTC)
- Agree I have no problem with it called a gun, but I see where it would be better to call it a bookmark in the encyclopedia. Deflagro 19:26, June 7, 2007 (UTC)
- On the Woodsball snipers page, I completely changed the "Weaponry" into a marker. I think if we do this, it will create a less violent paintball view. Currently there may be a bad view about sports. <-> booth Talk 20:39, July 9, 2007 (UTC)
- Very agree . The use of term weapons should not be confused with markers. Thank you Donutmonger, Robogymnast, and J-stan for your courageous contributions! RavenStorm 01:51, July 10, 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, we dare! Ã, :) <-> booth Talk 02:17, July 10, 2007 (UTC)
- Agree I have no problem with it called a gun, but I see where it would be better to call it a bookmark in the encyclopedia. Deflagro 19:26, June 7, 2007 (UTC)
Expanding this, maybe we should change "kill" to "elimination". <-> booth Talk 23:06, July 20, 2007 (UTC)
Paintball strategy removal review
I feel it is unacceptable to allow the removal of Paintball's strategy article to pass without comment from this wikiproek member. Deletion passed with 2 votes, no one is a member of this project. I propose a removal review as soon as possible. Mind? <-> booth Talk 16:08, July 19, 2007 (UTC)
- I do not know this article. Unfortunately I have to update my watchlist (which usually should contain all paintball articles, but since the "List paintball articles" category is on my watchlist I should pay attention to new articles as well) but our article makers and members should try their best to integrate this article into our project. As to whether or not it should be removed... well, I do not know. I never got a chance to see the article, but anything that sounds like a "paintball strategy" does not sound right to me. Strategy is an opinion, something to be published by an educated writer, and is usually unsuitable for the Wikipedia encyclopaedic format. Of course I really have to look at the articles to provide an assessment. Then we can decide whether the project will support this article or approve its deletion. RavenStorm 20:59, July 19, 2007 (UTC)
- My point is that the article, being part of this project, is deleted a) with two voices, too few to determine consensus and b) without the expressed opinion of this wikiproek member. It is recommended that it be transmitted to wikibooks, but half of the selector (mind you, one picker) tells me that it is instantly deleted. <-> booth Talk 21:07, July 19, 2007 (UTC)
I believe that the reason given by those involved with the removal of the article is legitimate and that the decision should remain in force. Pmicka 13:49, July 20, 2007 (UTC)
- Well that can be fixed! Compare Woodsball's strategy article. Maybe all we have to do is make a Speedball strategy article. That way we can have strategy articles for both games, not just one. <-> booth Talk 21:02, July 20, 2007 (UTC)
Ok, we really did not do anything
We have been marked as inactive. Let's edit it! J - stan Talk > Contribs 02:36, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Face it, most people who care about being nerd paintball really on other sites. * cough * * pbn * * cough * --N0tverycreative (talk) 23:19, November 13, 2008 (UTC)
TfD nominees from Template: PB-familiar
Template: PB-familiar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion on the template entry on the Template for Removal page. thanks. szyslak 09:38, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Template: Paintball-gun
Just wondering what others are thinking about this, but because of that WikiProject policy to refer to paintball weapons as a marker rather than a weapon, should we move {{Template: Paintball-gun}} to Template: Paintball-Marker? Just want to get someone else's thoughts about this. lag J - stan 808080 "> Talk Contribs 02:39, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Anyone else? lag J - stan 808080 "> Talk Contribs 17:55, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
- So should we move it? Because if we are the only two active, it will be unanimous by the Project to move it. ", lag ro T 21:38, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
- "Silence implies consensus". Straight forward. It makes more sense. J - stan 808080 "> Talk
- So should we move it? Because if we are the only two active, it will be unanimous by the Project to move it. ", lag ro T 21:38, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
- I'm also active! I agree with that step. Of course, seeing how you've started, my voice does not mean that's all right. Good work takes the initiative. --Donutmonger (talk) 09:24, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Ha. thanks. I moved it. Can you help me fix the links on what links here for the Paintball-gun template? If so start from the bottom and we will meet in the middle. Def lag ro C / T 22:26, ​​â € <â €
Restoring Proto SLG article
Back on November 17th, I created an article for the new Proto SLG marker, mostly because of the Proto SLG content in the Matrix Dye article, and both are really different bookmarks. Within hours, the article was marked for Speedy Deletion, and despite my protests, it was removed shortly thereafter.
I exchanged messages on the talk page from the admin who deleted the page (see here), and the basic argument was that the article was not "enough" enough - ie there was no outside third party source that independently discussed SLG. He was pretty good about it, and told me that the article could be recovered as soon as I returned to him with outside evidence that someone other than me or the manufacturer was talking about it.
Unfortunately, since this is a new marker, I have not been able to find anything about SLG, outside the usual places (paintball forums). So I made an open call for you guys to help. If you find something that discusses SLG Proto in depth, can you tell me that way I can forward it to admin? I think we all know that SLG is quite unique (the first automag-type marker at all times), but we need independent evidence outside. Thank you! --Donutmonger (talk) 07:50, December 12, 2007 (UTC)
- It's a blog, but I do not think you can quote it. This is a more professional blog. Sorry. That's all I can find now. Def lag ro C / T 22:02, December 12, 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, the blog will not work. I will help. J - booth Talk Contribs 22:20, December 12, 2007 (UTC)
- Yes I know we can not, but that's all I can find with a quick search. Def lag ro C / T 22:44, December 12, 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, the blog will not work. I will help. J - booth Talk Contribs 22:20, December 12, 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for your advice. I think just remember this, and if you find something on your internet travel, post it here. It's just frustrating because so many articles for less important markers (Spyder Rodeo?!) Have made it through the admin. --Donutmonger (talk) 02:50, December 13, 2007 (UTC)
Some things
Greetings, paintballers. I would like to let you know a note to let me know that I removed Tippinator. It is not within the scope of Wikipedia to have an amateur club like this, which has not received publicity. Join the debate on Wikipedias: Article for deletion/Tippinator. --Montchav (talk) 16:35, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Category: Paintball marker
I changed many paintball markers to be listed in categories in the same way. Most of them are just "Paintball markers" so I keep going that way. Some of them also have "Paintball", this is not necessary because the category "Paintball Markers" is part of the "Paintball" category. Do I have this right? thanks. AddZero (talk) 03:59, October 29, 2008 (UTC)
New Articles
Hey, I just made some new articles located in Portland Naughty Dogs and Ryan Podesta, and was wondering that since I'm relatively new to paintball, if I miss something.-- < span> Iamawesome 800 23:33, December 25, 2008 (UTC)
All the articles I created are at the bottom of the template.-- Iamawesome 800 23:05, December 26, 2008 (UTC)
Is there enough articles about this to justify the Outline of paintball?
Here is a discussion of developing subjects that might interest you.
The Transhumanist 23:58, 28 Juli 2009 (UTC)
Pengurangan backlog GAN - Olahraga dan rekreasi
As you know, we currently have 400 good article nominations, with a large number being in the sports and recreation sections. Thus, the waiting time for this is very long, longer than it should be. As a result of this, I ask any sports related WikiProject to review two or three of these nominations. If this is followed, then the backlog should be cleaned up quickly. Some projects nominate a lot but do not review, or vice versa, and following this will help to balance and make waiting times so much smaller that our articles can actually be reviewed! Wizardman 23:39, September 5, 2009 (UTC)
Tippmann A-5 Stock Barrel
I bought a Tippmann A-5, and when my barrel screw into the gun it did not look like it fitted at all. The barrel, though not too much, can be a bit rocky. I am wondering if this is normal. Can anyone help? - Unmarked comments were previously added by 69.14.16.71 (talk) 01:05, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
WP 1.0 bot announcement
This message is sent to every WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 rating system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010 , the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but your project summary table view will change. This upgrade will make many new optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available on the WP 1.0 project homepage. --Ã, Carl (CBM Ã, Â · talk) 03:45, January 22, 2010 (UTC)
Popular page bots
I have requested a Popular page bot for this project, which should be generated immediately (within a month I think). So until then, do not create any Popular Pages that are currently redlinked in tabs at the top of multiple pages. Applause! Jwoodger (talk) 21:34, March 11, 2010 (UTC)
Articles of people not referenced bots
User: DASHBot/Wikiprojects provides listings, updates daily , unreferenced person articles (BLP) related to your project. There has been much discussion recently about deleting this unreferenced article, so it's important that this article be referenced.
Unreferenced articles related to your project can be found at & gt; & gt; & gt; Wikipedia: WikiProject Paintball/BLP Unopened & lt; & lt; & lt;
If you do not want this wikiproek to participate, please add your project name to this list.
thanks.
- Update: Wikipedia: WikiProject Paintball/BLP Without Reference was created. This list, updated by Users: DASHBot/Wikiprojects daily, will allow your project wikipedia to quickly identify the articles of people who are not referenced.
- There may not be or some articles on this Not New BLP page. To increase the overall number of articles in your project with other bots, you can sign up for Users: Xenobot_Mk_V # Instructions.
- If you have any questions or concerns, please visit User talks: DASHBot/Wikiprojects. Okip 00:23, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
Good Articles
Paintball has been granted the status of Good Articles, congratulations to everyone involved! Let's not lose focus though - let's take aim for loftier articles of excellent articles for paintball, and bring other important articles to good status as well. Jwoodger (talk) 22:56, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
Sports Skill
There is an ongoing discussion at Wikipedia_talk: BIO # RFC: _WP: Athlete_Professional_Clause_Needs_Improvement debating possible changes to WP: ATHLETE notability guideline. As a result, some suggest using WP: NSPORT instead of WP: ATHLETE. Editing has begun at WP: NSPORT, please participate to help improve the notation guide for the sport covered by this wikiproek. --Joshua Scott (LiberalFascist) 03:12, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Impression Statistics
After a recent request, I added WikiProject Paintball to the list of projects to collect monthly pageview statistics for. This data is the same as used by http://stats.grok.se/en/but the program is different, and includes aggregate views of all redirects to each page. Statistics are on Wikipedia: WikiProject Paintball/Popular pages.
This page will be updated monthly with new data. Edits are not marked as bot edits, so they will appear in the watchlist. You can see more results, request new projects added to the list, or request a configuration change for this project using tool tools. If you have any comments or suggestions, please let me know. Thank you! Mr. Z - man 22:22, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
Paintball articles have been selected for the Wikipedia release 0.8
Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB keys, DVDs and mobile phones. Articles are selected based on assessed importance and quality, then article version (revisionID) is selected for trust (free from vandalism) using the adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.
We would like to ask you to review the Paintball article and revisionID we have selected. The selected article is marked with a diamond symbol (?) To the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have incorrectly entered or removed the article, please contact us at Wikipedia: Version 0.8 with details. You may want to look at your WikiProject article with a cleanup tag and try to improve anything that needs to be fixed; if you do, please give us a new revisionID at the Wikipedia talk: Version 0.8. We want to complete this consultation period at midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.
We have greatly simplified the process since the release of Version 0.7, so we aim to have a collection that is ready to be distributed by the end of October 2010. As a result, we plan to distribute the wider collection, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools expanding the reach of Wikipedia around the world. Please help us, with your WikiProject feedback!
For Wikipedia editorial team 1.0, SelectionBot 23:26, September 19, 2010 (UTC)
WikiProject cleaning list
I've created together with the Smallman12q tool tool that shows a list of weekly category cleanup for WikiProjects, which can be used instead of WolterBot and WikiProject including those already included (since this is a member of Category: Cleanup of WolterBot cleaning list). View the wiki tool page, list this project in one big table or by category and index WikiProjects. Svick (talk) 21:06, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
RfC on the use of the flag icon for athlete
RfC discussion about MOS: FLAG restrictions on the use of flag icons for athletes have been opened in Wikipedia talk: Manual Style/Icon. We invite all interested participants to give their opinion here. Qwyrxian (talk) 02:41, December 24, 2012 (UTC) Portal
: Sports available for superior portal considerations
This is a courtesy message to inform the members of this project that I have nominated Portal: Sport for the flagship portal status. This discussion is on Wikipedia: Portal/Portal Candidate: Sports. Featured portal criteria are on Wikipedia: Featured portal criteria. Do not hesitate to consider. color = "# F0A804"> What? 18:37, March 4, 2013 (UTC)
Popular page tool updates
Starting January, the popular page tool has been moved from Toolserver to Wikimedia Tool Labs. The code has changed significantly from the Toolserver version, but the user should pay attention to some differences. Please take a moment to view your project list for each anomaly, such as pages you expect to see missing or pages that seem to have more views than expected. Note that unlike other tools, this tool collects all views from redirects, which means it usually has a higher number. (For January 2014 specifically, 35 hours of data is lost from WMF data, which is expected from other dates For most articles, this should produce more accurate numbers, however some articles, as shown on the Main Page, may be dead).
The web tools, to replace those in the tool: ~ alexz/pop, will be available for the next few weeks in toollabs: popularpages. All historical data (back to July 2009 for some projects) has been copied. Tools for viewing historical data are currently partly available (assessment data and some projects may not be available at this time). Tools for adding new projects to the bots list are also available now (edit current project configuration coming soon). Unlike previous tools, all changes will be effective immediately. OAuth is used to authenticate users, so only ordinary users can make changes to prevent abuse. Visible history of adding configuration and changes will be coming soon. Once the tool becomes fully available, their server version will be redirected to Labs.
If you have any questions, want to report any bugs, or there are features you want to see that are not currently available in the Toolserver tool, see the updated FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Mr.Z-bot (talk) (for Mr. Z - man ) 05:20, February 23, 2014 (UTC)
Comment on WikiProject X proposal
Hello! As you know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia are struggling to stay active once they are established. I believe there are many potential WikiProjects to facilitate cross-field collaboration, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will learn what makes WikiProjects successfully defend the editor and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the previous posting error If someone has moved my message to the talk page, feel free to delete this post.) Harej (talk) 22:47, October 1, 2014 (UTC)
WikiProject X is being displayed!
You may have received a message from me previously asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we focused on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProject: good, bad, or neutral. We're also looking for WikiProjects who may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participation easier and projects more manageable. If you or WikiProject you are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be prompted to change anything that goes against its wish. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Harej (talk) 16:56, January 14, 2015 (UTC)
2016 Community Clients Submission Survey Proposal to Revive Popular Pages
Salam Anggota WikiProject Paintball!
This is a just one time message to let you know about a technical proposal to revive your Popular Pages list in the 2016 User Desire Surveys I thought You may be interested in reviewing and may even choose to:
- Fix and upgrade the popular Mr.Z-bot report page
If the above proposal is included in Top 10 by voice, it is most likely that this bot is restored so your project will again see the monthly updates of popular pages.
Furthermore, there are more than 260 proposals for review and selection, in many aspects of the wiki.
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues until December 12, 2016.
Warmest regards, Stevietheman - Sent: 18:05, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
RFC on sports notability
An RFC has recently started about a potential change in the guidance of notability for athletes. Please join the conversation. thanks. Primefac (talk) 23:09, May 5, 2017 (UTC)
Report the popular page
We - Community Tech - are happy to announce that the Popular page bot is back and running (after one year of absence)! You received this message because WikiProject or your task force signed up to receive a report on a popular page. Every month, the Community Tech bot will be posted on Wikipedia: WikiProject Paintball/Popular pages with the most viewed list of pages during the previous month that are within the scope of WikiProject Paintball.
We've made some improvements to the original report. Here's a new one:
- The pageview data includes desktop and mobile data.
- The report will include a link to the pageview tool for each article, to dig deeper any surprises or anomalies.
- The report will include the total pageviews for the entire project (including redirects).
We thank the Mr.Z-man for the original
Warmest Regards, Community Technology Team 17:16, May 17, 2017 (UTC)
Source of the article : Wikipedia
0 Comments